Ages of Gaia
Open the cover and bathe in great draughts of air that excitingly argue the case that the earth is alive - David Bellamy, Observer
In his first book, Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth, James Lovelock proposed a startling new theory of life. Existing theories held that plants and animals evolve on, but are distinct from, an inanimate planet. James Lovelock's theory, Gaia, showed that Earth, its rocks, oceans, and atmosphere, and all living things are part of one great organism, evolving over the vast span of geological time. Much scientific work has since confirmed Lovelock's theory.
IN this new book, Lovelock elaborates the basis of a new and unified view of the earth and life sciences, discussing recent scientific developments in detail: the greenhouse effect, acid rain, the depletion of the ozone layer and the effects of ultraviolet radiation, the emission of CFCs, and nuclear power. He demonstrates the geophysical interaction of atmosphere, oceans, climate, and the Earth's crust, regulated comfortably for life by living organisms using the energy of the sun.
But Gaia is not always the benign life-force many people have taken her to be: Gaia theory forces a planetary perspective. It is the health of the planet that matters, not that of some individual species of organisms. This is where Gaia and the environmental movements, which are concerned first with the health of people, part company. This hypothesis not only raises profound philosophical questions: it also challenges both conservationists and the scientific establishment to think again.
Cover photograph by Steve Krongard/The Image Bank
In his first book, Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth, James Lovelock proposed a startling new theory of life. Existing theories held that plants and animals evolve on, but are distinct from, an inanimate planet. James Lovelock's theory, Gaia, showed that Earth, its rocks, oceans, and atmosphere, and all living things are part of one great organism, evolving over the vast span of geological time. Much scientific work has since confirmed Lovelock's theory.
IN this new book, Lovelock elaborates the basis of a new and unified view of the earth and life sciences, discussing recent scientific developments in detail: the greenhouse effect, acid rain, the depletion of the ozone layer and the effects of ultraviolet radiation, the emission of CFCs, and nuclear power. He demonstrates the geophysical interaction of atmosphere, oceans, climate, and the Earth's crust, regulated comfortably for life by living organisms using the energy of the sun.
But Gaia is not always the benign life-force many people have taken her to be: Gaia theory forces a planetary perspective. It is the health of the planet that matters, not that of some individual species of organisms. This is where Gaia and the environmental movements, which are concerned first with the health of people, part company. This hypothesis not only raises profound philosophical questions: it also challenges both conservationists and the scientific establishment to think again.
Cover photograph by Steve Krongard/The Image Bank
Historical geology.
RELEASED1988
PUBLISHEROxford Univ Pr
LENGTH252
LANGUAGEEN
Ages of Gaia
Open the cover and bathe in great draughts of air that excitingly argue the case that the earth is alive - David Bellamy, Observer
In his first book, Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth, James Lovelock proposed a startling new theory of life. Existing theories held that plants and animals evolve on, but are distinct from, an inanimate planet. James Lovelock's theory, Gaia, showed that Earth, its rocks, oceans, and atmosphere, and all living things are part of one great organism, evolving over the vast span of geological time. Much scientific work has since confirmed Lovelock's theory.
IN this new book, Lovelock elaborates the basis of a new and unified view of the earth and life sciences, discussing recent scientific developments in detail: the greenhouse effect, acid rain, the depletion of the ozone layer and the effects of ultraviolet radiation, the emission of CFCs, and nuclear power. He demonstrates the geophysical interaction of atmosphere, oceans, climate, and the Earth's crust, regulated comfortably for life by living organisms using the energy of the sun.
But Gaia is not always the benign life-force many people have taken her to be: Gaia theory forces a planetary perspective. It is the health of the planet that matters, not that of some individual species of organisms. This is where Gaia and the environmental movements, which are concerned first with the health of people, part company. This hypothesis not only raises profound philosophical questions: it also challenges both conservationists and the scientific establishment to think again.
Cover photograph by Steve Krongard/The Image Bank
In his first book, Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth, James Lovelock proposed a startling new theory of life. Existing theories held that plants and animals evolve on, but are distinct from, an inanimate planet. James Lovelock's theory, Gaia, showed that Earth, its rocks, oceans, and atmosphere, and all living things are part of one great organism, evolving over the vast span of geological time. Much scientific work has since confirmed Lovelock's theory.
IN this new book, Lovelock elaborates the basis of a new and unified view of the earth and life sciences, discussing recent scientific developments in detail: the greenhouse effect, acid rain, the depletion of the ozone layer and the effects of ultraviolet radiation, the emission of CFCs, and nuclear power. He demonstrates the geophysical interaction of atmosphere, oceans, climate, and the Earth's crust, regulated comfortably for life by living organisms using the energy of the sun.
But Gaia is not always the benign life-force many people have taken her to be: Gaia theory forces a planetary perspective. It is the health of the planet that matters, not that of some individual species of organisms. This is where Gaia and the environmental movements, which are concerned first with the health of people, part company. This hypothesis not only raises profound philosophical questions: it also challenges both conservationists and the scientific establishment to think again.
Cover photograph by Steve Krongard/The Image Bank
Historical geology.
RELEASED1988
PUBLISHEROxford Univ Pr
LENGTH252
LANGUAGEEN
